September 8, 2010- In this unchallenged brain injury claim The 22 year old ICBC injury claimant suffered a brain injury 8 months before the car accident in which he claimed to have been injured. The first accident was clearly more severe than the second. But the trial judge accepted the evidence that the brain damage would not have occurred but for the second car accident. She accepted the evidence that the brain damage arising from the second collision was the cause of the injury claimant’s psycho-social injuries. ICBC intervened to represent the second driver and the driver failed to testify at the trial.