The Hidden Dangers of ICBC’s Use of Jury Trials in Car Accident Compensation

The Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (ICBC) plays a pivotal role in the province’s motor vehicle insurance landscape. Established in 1973, ICBC is not only the sole provider of basic auto insurance but also competes in the optional insurance market. While its mandate includes providing affordable insurance and promoting road safety, concerns have arisen over…

Read more
future earnings

$6 Million Loss of Earnings Award

In the personal injury case Kherani v. Da Silva, 2024 BCSC 1349 the claimant sought damages for personal injuries arising from a 2017 motor vehicle accident. The collision affected her ability to work as an ophthalmic surgeon, leading to a significant loss of income-earning capacity. This case summary focuses on the plaintiff’s loss of earnings…

Read more

Hit and Run Subjective Legal Test Clarified

In the personal injury appeal of Takhar v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2024 BCCA 275, the appellant sought an award for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident. The appellant was sideswiped by an unidentified vehicle while driving. Since the other driver could not be identified, he named the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia…

Read more
ICBC auto insurance Monopoly

ICBC and False Claims of Judicial Bias

ICBC claimed bias of the trial judge in the following ICBC injury case. The Court of Appeal disagreed with ICBC,  BC’s auto insurance monopoly. In particular ICBC claimed, without success that it was unfair that the judge: Expressed cynicism about the legislature’s motives in limiting the number of expert reports that can be commissioned; Commented…

Read more

Document Demands Close to Trial Dismissed

In the personal injury case of Forstved v. Kokabi, 2018 BCSC 111, the Supreme Court addressed three late applications seeking additional document production . The plaintiff, suffered a traumatic brain injury from a 2012 car accident which impaired his business competency and ability to earn income. The defendants requested numerous documents related to his  past…

Read more

Court Denies Injunction Against 6% Cap on Disbursements

In the case of Shrieves v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2024 BCSC 889, the Trial Lawyers Association of BC (TLABC) sought an interlocutory injunction to suspend its operation pending the resolution of their petition. A central issue before the court was whether there was a fair question to be tried regarding the petitioners’ challenge to…

Read more

Discrimination Claim Against ICBC No-Fault Injury System Ends in Dismissal

This self-represented injury claimant brought a lawsuit against the Attorney General aiming to have the ICBC no-fault legislation overturned (Lee v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2024 BCSC 865). He complained that he cannot sue the driver for negligence under the amended Insurance (Vehicle) Act (IVA), which permits lawsuits only if criminal conduct is involved. The…

Read more

Class Action Against ICBC for Injury Benefits Certified

In this class action lawsuit filed against the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, ICBC, the plaintiff seeks to certify a class action on behalf of all individuals who have purchased compulsory vehicle insurance from ICBC since its founding in 1973 (Rorison v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2024 BCSC 834)  This group is referred to…

Read more
ICBC auto insurance Monopoly

6% Cap to Profit ICBC Could be Illegal and Unconstitutional

According to the Petition filed by the Trial Lawyers Association of BC ( “TLABC”) on March 15, 2024 the Disbursements and Expert Evidence Regulation,  (the “DEER”)  is an unauthorized exercise of government authority and infringes the Charter  Rights of car accident claimants. The NDP government openly admit that this legislation was brought in to benefit…

Read more
Disbursements and Expert Evidence Regulation

6% Cap on Case Expenses for Car Accident Claimants: Case Review

Background to the 6% Cap on Disbursements The Disbursements and Expert Evidence Regulation caps disbursements in personal injury cases at 6% of the plaintiff’s total damages post-trial or settlement. It only applies to vehicle injury proceedings, essentially car accident cases. It requires injury claimants to apply to exclude disbursements from this cap before the disbursement…

Read more