Prior consistent statements are inadmissible to prove the truth of a statement. However, the use of such statements as narrative is allowed to show the fact or timing of a complaint. These statements may be of assistance in determining its truthfulness or credibility ( R. v. Dinardo, 2008 SCC 24, at para. 37). They may…
This ICBC claimant sought compensation for brain injury which he said was caused after he was thrown from his bicycle with no contact with the vehicle. There were several statements given to ICBC both in writing and by email which the court had to consider in determining fault. The issue regarding liability was whether the driver caused the…
Prior Consistent Statements are Admissible to Rebut ICBC Claims of Fabrication This incredible win by the injury claimant on appeal reaffirms the evidence rule that prior consistent statements of injury claimants are admissible to rebut an allegation of recent fabrication (T. v. ICBC et al, 2016 BCCA 373). Prior consistent statements can include ICBC dial-a-claim reports, signed ICBC…